Thursday, April 11, 2013

Will the citizens of Ireland perhaps continue to benefit, without compunction or moral crisis, from the work of the so-called apartheid state's great scientists? I would like to help, or better yet to raise the moral bar that the Republic of Ireland has for us Israelis. I believe that a boycott is a boycott, and if you are already taking such a measure, go all the way.




Yaakov Ahimeir..
Israel Hayom..
11 April '13..

The Irish teachers' union, comprising 14,000 teachers and university instructors, declared an academic boycott on Israel this week. Sadly, given Ireland's attitude toward Israel, the decision does not come as a surprise. Implementing this boycott would mean the end of all academic and research cooperation with Israel, something which seems natural as Ireland is the most hostile nation to Israel in Europe.

The reasoning provided by the thousands of educators was that Israel is an "apartheid state." Still, we wonder: Will our Irish boycotters be satisfied with a written declaration, though one that is unequivocally harsh? Will the citizens of Ireland perhaps continue to benefit, without compunction or moral crisis, from the work of the so-called apartheid state's great scientists? I would like to help, or better yet to raise the moral bar that the Republic of Ireland has for us Israelis. I believe that a boycott is a boycott, and if you are already taking such a measure, go all the way.

Why don't the Irish complete their scientific boycott and add the products of Israeli medical research? I call on all doctors in Ireland not to recommend Copaxone, used to treat multiple sclerosis, to their patients, as it was developed at Weizmann Institute by Professor Michael Sela and Professor Ruth Arnon, renowned scientists of the apartheid state. We can't have such apartheid exports reaching sick beds in Ireland. It would be a moral travesty. Or maybe the Irish should stop using Exelon, which slows the progression of Alzheimer's disease. That medication was developed by Professor Martha Rezin from the Jerusalem School of Pharmacy.


To be clear, we wish the residents of Ireland health and a long life, but we don't believe they should compromise their principles. So let's not leave out the Technion Institute of Technology either. The Irish should also boycott the treatment for Parkinson's disease that was developed there, Azilect, with credit also due to Teva and scientists Moussa Yodim and John Feinberg. We don't want to overload our Irish boycotters with information, but we also call on them to boycott the personal computer, which is run by a microprocessor developed at Intel in Israel.

Of course these are only a few of the discoveries that Israeli scientific research is responsible for. It is incumbent upon Ireland to boycott all of them, because the country's integrity is at stake. It must not sully itself by using any "despicable" products, even life-saving ones, that were developed in the apartheid state.

It's doubtful that Ireland will act on our recommendations. But that's because their boycott is rife with hypocrisy: Any Irish doctor who thinks that an Israeli-developed medication might save his patient's life will toss the boycott into the trash. And that's the case for every product made in Israel, which are the fruits of Israeli scientific research.

12 tribes circle symbols

Wednesday, April 10, 2013

Israel strikes back after cyberattack by Anonymous – UPI.com


Israel strikes back after cyberattack by Anonymous – UPI.com.
Published: April 9, 2013 at 2:43 PM
TEL AVIV, Israel,
April 9 (UPI) — Israel battled a widely touted cyberassault during the weekend, supposedly organized by the pro-Palestinian hacktivist group Anonymous, and unleashed retaliatory attacks against dozens of sites in Iran, Turkey, Pakistan, Indonesia and North Africa.
Media reports said the attacks by a so-called Israeli “strike force” targeted sites where the cyberassaults had originated in what Anonymous had claimed would be “the largest Internet battle in the history of mankind.”
It was not clear whether the Israeli retaliation, which appears to have been extensive, involved elements of the new military cyber command the Defense Ministry has been putting together under a $320 million program announced in 2012.
But it would make sense for it to be involved in the weekend cyber conflict since the military says the Jewish state, which has reputedly played a major role in repeated high-powered cyberattacks on Iran’s nuclear program since 2009, is being increasingly targeted by its Muslim foes.
The military declined comment after the attack Sunday, Israel’s Holocaust Remembrance Day, an apparent follow-up to a blitz by Anonymous and its affiliates during Israel’s 8-day clash with Hamas in the Gaza Strip in November.
“It’s not a military matter,” a spokeswoman said.
As it happens, the much-hyped cyberattack, dubbed #opIsrael, and the threat to “wipe Israel off the map of the Internet” announced April 5 on YouTube appears to have been something of a fizzle.
The Bank of Israel and several government sites, including the Education Ministry, the Tax Authority and the Central Bureau of Statistics, were reported to have been briefly shut down or defaced.
Up to 100 other sites, mainly small businesses without security software, were also affected by what Anonymous called the “Hackintifada #Free Palestine,” a reference to Palestinian intifadas, or uprisings against Israeli occupation.
Government officials downplayed the impact of the assault. But security sources believe further attacks are likely, and these may be more damaging than Sunday’s attempted blitz and may aim for more strategic targets.
The retaliation to Sunday’s attacks by an “Israeli Elite Strike Force” appears to have been Israeli hackers acting on their own initiative.
But there have been growing signs that attacks by supposedly independent operators, such as the weekend cyber thrust against Israel, are in fact the work of state actors.
Such attacks, Oxford Analytica observed, “can have a disproportionate impact on international relations … for motives and aims subversive to international order.
“The greatest danger could emanate from a ‘catalytic’ cyber attack, whereby a dissatisfied party — for example, a militant group acting under cover of a third state — instigates conflict among two other states — say, the United States and China.
“The capacity of existing conflict management mechanisms to mitigate the risks of such an eventuality does not seem promising,” Oxford Analytica cautioned.
In recent months, Israel’s military has inaugurated a cyber-defense control center as the Jewish state grapples with a sharp increase in cyberattacks, most of them supposedly from archenemy Iran.
At the same time, Israel’s amassing a multibillion-dollar arsenal of electronic weapons to use against the Islamic Republic in a largely covert campaign, but which could come out of the shadows if Israel decides to launch pre-emptive strikes against Iran’s contentious nuclear program.
The United States worries about Chinese attacks on its financial and industrial infrastructure. But Israel’s focus is almost entirely on Iran.
The Jerusalem Post quoted a senior Israeli military source as saying there’s been a dramatic rise in cyberattacks on the digital infrastructure of the armed forces and Iran’s seen as the culprit.
“The world of attacks is changing rapidly,” he explained as the new center, two years in the planning, became operational in February.
“Few countries have this kind of defense ability,” he noted. “This is part of the military’s readiness to ensure continuity of conventional operations. This continuity is based on cybersecurity.”
Iran, on the receiving end of U.S. and Israel cyber operations, seems determined to enhance its offensive cyber capability, largely to deter the crippling 2009-10 cyber attacks on the uranium enrichment sector of its nuclear program using the Stuxnet worm.
In mid-2012, Western intelligence sources estimated Tehran had spent $1 billion to upgrade its cyber capabilities in less than two years

Netanyahu: I'm determined to end conflict with Palestinians


In meeting with U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says Palestinian recognition of Israel as a Jewish state and security arrangements are the first issues that must be discussed in negotiations • Kerry: Iran cannot and will not have a nuclear weapon.
Shlomo Cesana, Daniel Siryoti and Israel Hayom Staff

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry says his talks with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu were "very productive."
|
Photo credit: AP

Alan Dershowitz on Jimmy Carter’s Human Rights Award from Jewish Law School: “I Can’t Imagine A Worse Person to Honor for Conflict Resolution”


April 8, 2013 5:30 pm 40 comments

Author:

avatar Zach Pontz

Former President Jimmy Carter. Photo: www.reddogreport.com.
The Cardozo School of Law, which is associated with Yeshiva University, has decided to honor former U.S. President Jimmy Carter with its annual “International Advocate for Peace” award on Wednesday. This has many alumni and other members of the Jewish community up in arms, not least of which is because of Carter’s penchant for labeling Israel an “apartheid state”  and his chumminess with Yasser Arafat and the current Hamas leadership. (For more of Carter’s activities in the region see here.)
“I can’t imagine a worse person to honor for conflict resolution. Here’s a man who has engendered conflict wherever he goes. He has encouraged terrorism by Hamas and Hezbollah. He was partly responsible for Yasser Arafat turning down the Clinton-Barak peace offer,” Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz told The Algemeiner in an interview. Dershowitz wrote about Carter in his book “The Case Against Israel’s Enemeies: Exposing Jimmy Carter and Others Who Stand in the Way of Peace.”
“He is significantly responsible for the second Intifada. If he had told Yasser Arafat to accept that deal we might be celebrating Palestinian statehood today,” Dershowitz added. “He just prefers terrorists to Israelis.”
Lori Lowenthal Marcus at the Jewish Press did some digging as to who, exactly, was responsible for deciding Carter should be this year’s honoree. “The law school administration has insisted – through a statement issued by a public relations firm – it was a choice made by the students. Sources have suggested the opposite is the case,” she writes.
It’s even up for debate as to whether or not the Dean of the Cardozo Law School Mathew Diller will be attending. Marcus reports that “some concerned individuals were told ‘on good assurance’ that neither Cardozo’s Dean Diller nor YU’s President Joel would be present at the award ceremony, and that they were completely uninvolved.”
But in a letter to some wealthy alumni Diller wrote that he hoped they would “plan to join me in welcoming the 39th President of the United States to the law school.”
Dershowitz doesn’t blame the school, however. “In my own opinion it was a dumb, dumb decision by a group of students who are either ignorant or ideologically associated with Jimmy Carter,” he said.
In any case, Israel or not, Dershowitz questions the wisdom of honoring an individual who, in general, doesn’t have the best track record where human rights are concerned.
“Carter during his presidency sat idly by while 2 million Cambodians were killed by Pol Pot. He has been bought and paid for by Saudi Extremists. His Carter Center stopped investigating human rights abuses in Saudi Arabia when he received payment from important and wealthy Saudi businessmen,” Dershowitz said. “He has used the word apartheid to describe Israel but he never used the word in reference to Saudi Arabia which practices gender apartheid, religious apartheid, sexual preference apartheid.”
If anything, Dershowitz argues, Carter has harmed efforts to make the world a more peaceful place. “Before Jimmy Carter came along human rights were neutral. You attacked the left, you attacked the right. You attacked who were the worst perpetrators. Not with Jimmy Carter. He never attacks the left. He never attacks the Arab or Muslim world. He has turned human rights essentially into human lefts and distorted the concept of human rights. Eleanore Roosevelt and real founders of the human rights movement are turning over in their graves.”
But Dershowitz thinks that Carter’s presence on campus this week should be used as a positive. Students should attend the ceremony “and in a dignified and respectful way show contempt for Jimmy Carter,” he said. “Students should know who they’re honoring. The response to bad speech is good speech. You don’t cancel the event you use it as an educational opportunity to teach people about the evil things that Jimmy Carter has done.”

Why Are Only Jews Referred to as Terrorists in the Media?

April 10, 2013 14:17 by HonestReporting has long campaigned for the international media to call terrorism exactly what it is instead of using judgment-neutral terminology, such as “militants”,”extremists”, “fighters” or “gunmen.”
Yaakov “Jack” Teitel, a US-born Israeli resident of the West Bank was sentenced on Tuesday to two consecutive life terms in prison for murdering a Palestinian taxi driver in Jerusalem and a Palestinian shepherd near Hebron. He was also sentenced for other attacks including against a left-wing Israeli professor and messianic Jews. He also attacked a police station during a gay pride parade. These are only a few of Teitel’s terrorist and criminal activities.
The Israeli media, including the JPost, YNet, and Times of Israel had no problem referring to him as a “Jewish terrorist” showing an impressive consistency in the use of language. They recognized that Teitel’s hate-filled ideologically and politically motivated ideology fits the definition of terrorism. This demonstrates that the use of the word “terrorism” or “terrorist” or “terror” does not have to be a loaded term applied only to Palestinians murdering Jews for religious or political motivations.
It’s just that the example of Teitel is, thankfully, extremely rare and certainly in contrast to the Palestinian side.
So having avoided referring to Palestinian terrorists as just that, how did the international media cover the story?
This from Sky News:
The Times of London also followed suit:
The LA Times and Reuters both referred to Teitel as having been “dubbed “The Jewish Terrorist” by the Israeli media” while the New York Times wrote that Teitel was “known as “The Jewish terrorist.”
But where is the consistency?
If the media is prepared to acknowledge the Israeli media’s usage of the term when applied to a Jewish terrorist, why then, are they still not prepared to apply it to Palestinian terrorists?
When it comes to consistency, it is difficult to match AFP’s long-standing aversion to labeling Palestinian terrorists as anything other than “militants” or “activists.” Bizarrely, AFP, in its coverage, refers to Teitel as a “religious activist.”
While the term “activist” is consistent with AFP’s approach, we have to ask if the wire service ever refers to religiously motivated Muslim terrorists as “religious activists” or is this term only reserved for Jews?
At least the Associated Press demonstrated consistency when it referred to Teitel as a “radical” and “extremist.”
To reiterate – the description of Yaakov Teitel as a “terrorist” is not the issue. What is disturbing, however, is the sudden acceptance of the term by some media as a legitimate reference to an Israeli Jew while avoiding it when referring to Palestinians or other Arabs involved in the murder of Jews. Isn’t it time for some consistency when it comes to the “T-word?”

Image: CC BY-SA HonestReporting.com, flickr/ryanbrunsvold, flickr/schoffer.

Sanctimonious Jewish bleeding hearts


Isi Leibler



I was somewhat taken aback by a letter released in the wake of U.S. President Barack Obama's visit to Israel, signed by 100 American Jews including a number of rabbis, communal leaders and academics, many, if not most of whom are politically inclined to the Left but regard themselves as committed Zionists. It urged Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to "work closely" with Secretary of State John Kerry to "devise pragmatic initiatives, consistent with Israel's security needs, which would represent Israel's readiness to make painful territorial sacrifices for the sake of peace."
The petition was orchestrated by the Israel Policy Forum, a declining left-wing Jewish group that is seeking to revive itself. It is the same organization that in 2005 provided the platform for former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert to deliver his notorious speech justifying the disastrous Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip. His deplorable statement — "We are tired of fighting, we are tired of being courageous, we are tired of defeating our enemies" — is likely to haunt him for the rest of his life.
The Israel Policy Forum letter is by no means stylistically confrontational. It even congratulates Netanyahu for displaying "leadership" in his yet unfulfilled efforts to achieve a "rapprochement" with Turkey.
It also praises Obama's visit to Israel and urges Netanyahu to respond to his call by "taking concrete confidence building steps designed to demonstrate Israel's commitment to a 'two states for two peoples' solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict."
Yet as I read and mulled over this letter, I became increasingly angered.
Is it not somewhat of a chutzpah for American Jewish "leaders," especially those who consider themselves to be Zionists, to provide unsolicited advice to the Israeli prime minister, calling on him to make further "painful territorial sacrifices for peace"?
Have we not made sacrifices? And have territorial compromises brought us any closer to peace? Are these American Jewish leaders not aware of the disastrous consequences of unilateral territorial concessions such as the Gaza disengagement?
"Zionist" Diaspora activists would never have had the gall to publicly convey such public declarations to Prime Ministers Yitzhak Rabin or Menachem Begin. They would have been excoriated. One need only recollect Rabin's violent denunciation of certain right-wing American Israel Public Affairs Committee officials who dared question Israel's security policies when the Oslo Accords were instituted.
Such remarks are particularly offensive coming from a group like the Israel Policy Forum, which the conservative Emergency Committee for Israel justly pointed out had "from the safety of America, in the past recommended trusting Arafat, dividing Jerusalem, surrendering the Golan Heights to Syria, and withdrawing from territory that today is controlled by Iranian-backed terrorist groups."
To what purpose is the Israel Policy Forum now placing the onus on Israel to make concessions in advance of negotiations? Has not the Palestinian Authority continuously spurned Israeli government offers to negotiate without any preconditions?, Even Obama has now been obliged to tell Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas that his tactic of seeking to extract concessions before negotiations were even in place was ludicrous and obliged him to endorse Israel's call to the Palestinians to negotiate without preconditions.
How can these American Jews justify preaching to Israeli leaders concerning the virtues of peace? They must be aware that whatever their failings, Israelis who over successive generations with their families have or are serving in the Israel Defense Forces, do not require patronizing lectures from "friends" abroad concerning the virtues of peace and making sacrifices to achieve it.
Perhaps the Israel Policy Forum seeks to pressure Netanyahu to renew or up the ante on the offers of Prime Ministers Ehud Barak and Ehud Olmert to the PA when they offered to cede 95 percent of the territories over the Green Line but were totally rebuffed by the Palestinians.
The letter incorporates the usual ritual incantation to Palestinian leaders "to take similar constructive steps including a return to the negotiating table."
Were the signatories aware that even disregarding Hamas, in recent years Abbas and the PA have not agreed to a single meaningful reciprocal concession? And that Abbas and other Palestinian leaders repeatedly reiterate that the disavowal of violence was based on pragmatic rather than moral grounds and frequently allude to reverting to the "armed struggle" if considered tactically advantageous?
Besides, the deteriorating relationship with Gaza and the renewed launch of missiles against civilian targets makes meaningful negotiations with the PA — which proclaims its determination of reuniting with Hamas — an Alice in Wonderland absurdity.
The timing of the Israel Policy Forum letter was undoubtedly designed to impact on Kerry's visit to the region.
In the course of his visit to Israel, Obama made a series of highly positive statements regarding the U.S. commitment to Israel, as well as personally expressing unprecedented praise of Zionism.
But at his address to a predominately left-wing student audience, he alluded to his earlier formula which, in terms of boundaries, paralleled the so-called Arab League peace initiative, originally orchestrated in 2002 by Saudi Arabia, which proposed a settlement based on the indefensible 1949 armistice lines and a return to Israel of the millions of descendants of so-called Arab refugees.
It is rumored that Kerry is planning to promote this formulation which no responsible Israeli government could ever conceivably adopt and would be vehemently opposed by the vast majority of Israelis.
One is therefore entitled to ask who would be the beneficiaries from such a letter. Clearly, especially as it emanates from purported Zionists, it exerts pressure exclusively on Israel.
If concerned Jews genuinely sought to make a constructive contribution to the peace process, in lieu of writing letters to Netanyahu, they should send messages to Abbas (copying Kerry), demanding an end to the PA-sponsored anti-Semitic incitement which is virtually indistinguishable from that of Hamas and urge him to recognize the Jewish state.
We are accustomed to demented anti-Israeli Jews and Israel Policy Forum or J Street apparatchiks seeking to exert pressure on the Israeli government to make further unilateral concessions. But we are surely entitled to expect Jewish activists, especially those who regard themselves as Zionists, to pause and reflect on the ramifications of endorsing letters promoting policies impinging on security to an Israeli government under siege politically and militarily from its adversaries. Such initiatives serve no purpose other than to weaken Israel's ability to negotiate and undermine its security.
Were the signatories living in Israel and calling on their government to take "confidence-building measures," they would be acting within their legitimate democratic rights. But they would also be sharing the impact of such decisions on the security and lives of their families.
We are entitled to expect Zionists not to behave like the naive "fellow travelers" who during the Cold War blindly endorsed communist peace petitions that ultimately only promoted the interests the Evil Empire.
It is unethical and unconscionable for bleeding-heart American Zionist "friends" to display disrespect and intervene to thwart the policies determined by the democratically elected leaders of Israel or offer them patronizing advice on how best to ensure their security.
Isi Leibler's website can be viewed at www.wordfromjerusalem.com. He may be contacted at ileibler@leibler.com.

Monday, April 8, 2013

'We will never leave our fate in the hands of others'

Speaking at the annual Yad Vashem ceremony marking Holocaust Remembrance Day, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vows: "There will never be another Holocaust" • President Shimon Peres: The Jewish spirit cannot be burned in crematoria.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President Shimon Peres

Netanyahu speaks as soldiers stand at the opening ceremony of the Holocaust Remembrance Day at the Yad Vashem.
|
Photo credit: AP

TEL AVIV -REMEMBER MOMENT- ALARM-08-04-13 HOLOCAUST DAY

A Turkish Muslim perspective on Yom HaShoah

by Sinem Tezyapar



When people of reason and conscience look back on the subject of Shoah (otherwise known as the Holocaust) today, it is common to hear questions like: "How could a nation of philosophers, composers of classical music, technology, poets, in this seat of the Enlightenment itself, suddenly give vent to savagery not seen since the Dark Ages? How could such dreadful, inhumane impulses seize every apparatus of a nation and cause it to commit such atrocities?"
In looking at the subject of the Holocaust violence, we can see the obvious influence of pseudo-scientific thought as well as a reversion to a far darker philosophy in human history. Arguably, the roots of anti-Semitism in Europe run quite deep, and found their most lethal expression in the Shoah itself; when some six million innocent Jewish men, women and children were done to death on the edge of mass graves in the Ukraine, Poland and Russia or had their lives systematically snuffed out at factories of mass murder such as Sobibor, Majdanek, Auschwitz-Birkenau, Treblinka, Chelmo and Belzec, names that shall forever be remembered as grim testaments to hatred. While it is not my intention to go too in-depth on the roots of European anti-Semitism, it must be touched upon in order to illustrate how prejudice led to disdain, then to hatred, and finally to genocide.
Anti-Semitism in Europe has a long and tragic history. For many centuries, this dislike of the Jewish people of the Diaspora was confined to the religious and social sphere; indeed, it's all too easy to recall such events as the massacres of the First Crusade in 1096, the Spanish Inquisition, and the expulsion of the Jews from Spain in 1492, the assorted pogroms in Russia and Ukraine; the list is long and horrific. This awful situation persisted as recently as 1959, when a reference to "… perfidious Jews" was finally dropped from the Good Friday Liturgy of the Catholic Church (it must be said here that the Roman Catholic Church has made enormous strides in its relations with the Jewish people, most notably beginning with Vatican II and the later efforts of Pope John Paul II; and let us not forget the many Catholics – and others – who risked, and in some cases, lost their lives to save innocent Jews from Nazi terror).
Until the 19th century, European anti-Semitism was largely confined to the religious sphere (and to a lesser extent, the socio-economic sphere as well). Then, by the middle of the Nineteenth Century, it began to change in tone and style. Anti-Semitism became no longer a matter of theological difference, but rather a matter of biological differences. This was the introduction of so-called "scientific racism" through the introduction and application of Darwinian evolutionary theory, which had gained widespread acceptance by the end of the Nineteenth Century. And with this, the argument among European anti-Semites changed from, "Let us convert the Jews" to "Let us rid ourselves of this infectious and invasive species" (May God forbid). Simply put, an openly exterminationist sentiment had arisen, based on pseudo-scientific reasoning. The Jewish people had gone from being "the Other" to being "the Subhuman", "a bacillus", "a virus". Surely they are beyond this defamation.
Darwinism, and its false implication that human beings are mere animals, classified as "superior", "inferior" or "non-human" is the basis for the pseudo-science of racism. When Hitler said, "Take away the Nordic Germans and nothing remains but the dance of apes", he was referring to the falsehood of Darwinist ideas. (Carl Cohen, Communism, Fascism and Democracy, Random House, New York, 1972, p. 408-409) While certainly, there are differences between people, to suggest that a group of people is inherently superior to another, and therefore has a right or moral imperative to subjugate the other, is a grossly mistaken idea.
As a result of such pseudo-scientific fallacies and and neo-romanticist fantasies, six million Jews, innocent men, women and children over a vast swath of the European continent were dehumanized, corralled into ghettoes and exterminated by the conquering Nazis. According to their racial delusion, the Nazi herrenvolk would rule over a vast empire of slaves, with the conquered peoples being the hewers of wood and drawers of water, and with the Jewish people (not to mention anyone else who failed to measure up to the Nazis exacting Darwinian standards) having been eliminated from the face of the earth itself. The Nazis' crude interpretations of Darwinism – influenced by agricultural practices such as animal husbandry – and their outlandish views of history such as Ariosophy, are all too familiar to anyone with even a rudimentary education, and there is no need to comprehensively explain their overall ideology. There are indeed people alive in Israel today, and many other countries, who survived this darkest period of human history, who can easily attest to the horrors they witnessed and experienced.
As Muslims, we bear a special obligation to confront the anti-Semitism that has infected the Muslim world. We must not traffic in discredited ideas and unbecoming stereotypes or proclaim, as truth, notorious forgeries such as "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" (it has been well known for almost a century now that this tract was a forgery by the Czarist Secret Police in order to justify pogroms in Russia). We must not subscribe to pseudo-scientific notions such as racism, nor allow ourselves to succumb to pseudo-historic nonsense such as Holocaust Denial. When it comes to anti-Semitism, we must confront it. We must educate against it. And most of all, we must repudiate it utterly.
We can also look to the recent past and remember how Turkish diplomats worked to save Jews from persecution and extermination during the Second World War. Although it is neither as emphasized or as well-known as the stories of Oskar Schindler or Raoul Wallenberg, it is a fact that Turkish diplomats provided official documents such as citizenship cards and passports to thousands of Jews. Just to give one example, the Turkish ambassador Behiç Erkin -in order to save the Jews- gave the Nazis documents certifying that their property, houses and businesses, belonged to Turks. In this way, many lives were saved. Yet another example is that of the Turks who organized boats to carry Jews to safety in Turkey. My intention in mentioning this is that Muslim Turks' attitude for centuries has demonstrated that Turks and Jews have continued to help each other in times of great crises and God willing, it will continue to be this way, no matter what happens.
For hundreds of years, Jews have known suffering, pain, and have never been at ease. Since the Diaspora, they have been expelled from almost every place they ever went for centuries. And now there are some who say they want the Jews to leave Israel also. The question arises, "Where are they supposed to go?" The Jews, the people of Israel, have the right to live in the Holy Land, in peace and security; indeed, it is so commanded by God Himself in the Qur'an: "And thereafter We said to the Children of Israel: 'Dwell securely in the Promised Land.'" (Surah Al-Isra, 104) Therefore, no one who professes submission to God and heeds the Word of God can oppose their existence in the Holy Land. And as Turks, as Muslims as much as we want the welfare of humanity, we want Jews to live in peace as well. We will always make our best efforts to ensure this goal. To do otherwise is to stand in defiance to the Will of God Himself.

The author is a political and religious commentator from Turkey, and an executive producer at a Turkish TV. She is also the spokesperson of a prominent international interfaith organization. She can be reached on http://www.facebook.com/sinemtezyapar and https://twitter.com/SinemTezyapar.
Tracker Pixel for Entry

Sunday, April 7, 2013

Anonymous has failed in achieving its stated goal od erasing Israel from the internet. See this report from Israel written by a member:


Note that the amateur "hackers" of Anonymous are failing so they are deliberately using deceptive techniques to make you think some big sites are down when they are not down. They rely on most people being naive about how the Internet works so they are claiming tons of big Israeli government sites are down when they are not. They have only managed to hack into the usual low level un-secure websites that have little to no protection and that have no impact on Israel or our economy. They have failed so they are resorting to cheap tactics and psychological games, do not buy into it! Bringing down a site that sells Crystals online is not something to be proud of and is completely against their main goal which is to bring down the entire Internet in Israel. The fact that you can see this message means that they have failed hopelessly.

What can we believe? This is just in. Did the cyber attack succeed or not?




Israel Hayom | Massive cyberattack underway, Israeli hackers fire back

A weekend cyberattack campaign targeting Israeli government websites failed to cause serious disruption, officials said Sunday. The attacks followed warnings in the name of the hacking group Anonymous that it was launching a massive attack.

The wide-ranging cyberattack was scheduled to officially begin at 6 p.m. Israel time. According to the Internet hacker group Anonymous, it would be the largest cyberattack ever against the Jewish state.

Yitzhak Ben Yisrael, of the government's National Cyber Bureau, said the hackers had mostly failed to shut down key sites.

"So far it is as was expected, there is hardly any real damage," Ben Yisrael said. "Anonymous doesn't have the skills to damage the country's vital infrastructure. And if that was its intention, then it wouldn't have announced the attack ahead of time. It wants to create noise in the media about issues that are close to its heart."

Thousands of private Facebook accounts were also hacked as of Sunday.

Israeli hackers, meanwhile, have already returned fire, breaching opisrael.com, the site where members of Anonymous report about their anti-Israel activities, and altered its contents to make them pro-Israel.

Ronni Bahar of the Avnet Security Consulting firm said that the hacking of the site was a moral victory in and of itself: "We are witness mainly to the build-up of tensions and power struggles between Israeli hackers and those affiliated with Anonymous. We can tell of directives given to employees to alter their email passwords. Many organizations have uploaded their sites to cloud servers."

Alon Mantzur, CEO of 2Bsecure of the Matrix Group, added that Israeli preparedness today is "better than it was a year ago in all areas."

The cyberattack is liable to prevent access to hacked sites, and infect them with viruses and Trojan horses. The Israel National Cyber Bureau advised large institutions to block overseas access to their websites. According to speculation, the cyberattack will focus on well-known websites and will try to shut down services they provide the public, which the hackers hope will raise awareness of the attack and cause panic.

For a list of the websites targeted for attack a group calling itself "Team Danger Hackers (#OpIsrael)" click here.

The Israel Defense Forces was also preparing its cyber defenses, announcing that the Telecommunications Branch has run a diagnostics check on all of its systems and also simulated various attack scenarios in order to test its preparedness.

On Saturday, the Israel Securities Authority website was downed, but its sister financial reportage site, Maya, remained unaffected. The ISA site was up and running again Sunday morning. Sites affiliated with the Absorption Ministry, the Intelligence and Atomic Energy Ministry and others were also attacked.

Israel's Bureau of Statistics was down on Sunday morning but it was unclear if it had been hacked. Israeli media reports said the sites of the Defense and Education Ministry as well as banks had come under attack the night before but they were mostly repelled.

Hackers also exploited holes in the cyber protection for dozens of small businesses.

One of the sites already hacked belongs to the Larger than Life organization, which also help Muslim children suffering from cancer. Larger than Life CEO Lior Shmueli said Saturday, "It's a shame that such a thing is happening to the organization's website, of all places, which seeks to help every child with cancer receiving treatment in Israel, without discriminating against religion, race, sex or nationality."

An official of the terrorist Hamas movement praised the current attack. "God bless the minds and the efforts of the soldiers of the electronic battle," Ihab Al- Ghussian, Gaza's chief government spokesman, wrote on his official Facebook page.

Native American Tribal Support for the State of Israel

Israeli Flag & Metis Flag

 By Rachel Avraham

 Israeli Flag & Metis Flag
The Palestinians and their supporters have attempted to present their struggle as parallel to that of the Native Americans. This push was led by George Bisharat, an anti-Israel activist whose ancestors only immigrated to the holy land in the 1920’s, yet who nevertheless insists that he is an indigenous person who was forcefully uprooted, just like the Native Americans were. In reality, the Jews are Israel’s indigenous people, but that has not stopped Palestinian organizations such as Adalah and the Students for Justice in Palestine from playing on the Native American struggle to serve their own interests. However, numerous Native Americans have rejected any comparison between their struggle and that of the Palestinians, preferring to identify with Israel instead.
As Ryan Bellerose, a member of the Métis nation in Canada, wrote, “The Palestinians are not like us. Their fight is not our fight. We natives believe in bringing about change peacefully, and we refuse to be affiliated with anyone who engages in violence targeting civilians. I cannot remain silent and allow the Palestinians to gain credibility at our expense by claiming commonality with us. I cannot stand by while they trivialize our plight by tying it to theirs, which is largely self-inflicted. Our population of over 65 million was violently reduced to a mere 10 million, a slaughter unprecedented in human history. To compare that in whatever way to the Palestinians’ story is deeply offensive to me. The Palestinians did lose the land they claim is theirs, but they were repeatedly given the opportunity to build their state on it and to partner with the Jews — and they persistently refused peace overtures and chose war. We were never given that chance. We never made that choice.”
Chief Anne Richardson of the Rappahannock Tribe in Virginia and Kathy Cummings-Dickinson, head of the Lumbee tribes in North Carolina
Chief Anne Richardson of the Rappahannock Tribe in Virginia and Kathy Cummings-Dickinson, head of the Lumbee tribes in North Carolina
To the contrary of Palestinian assertions, Bellerose sees parallels between the Native American struggle and that of the Jewish people. He asserted, “The Jews also suffered genocide and were expelled from their homeland. They were also rejected by everyone and forced to wander. Like us, they rebelled against imperial injustice when necessary and, despite their grievances, strived for peace whenever possible. Like us they were given a tiny sliver of their land back after centuries of suffering and persecution, land that nobody else had wanted to call home until then. Like us, they took that land despite their misgivings and forged a nation from a fractured and wounded people. And like us, they consistently show a willingness to compromise for the good of their people.”
Ryan Bellerose is far from the only Native American to feel this way. Santos Hawk Blood, a full blooded Native American who is an activist for Native American land and fishing rights, similarly proclaimed, “One indigenous people should support another indigenous people. I come from the same Apaches as Cochese and Geronimo, the Chiricahua people from Southern Arizona. Like all Apaches, we were warriors. When more passive Indians were attacked by marauding groups, we fought for them. It is a part of Apache culture to stand up for oppressed people and to respect all people who cherish their ancestral land. I admire the people who take a stand, and that’s why I admire the people of Israel: They’re people who stand up to defend their homeland. We are not with the Palestinian people.” His mother also declared, “The Jews are people like us. They have been forced from their land, forced to move from place to place. They have suffered like us and have been attacked wherever they go.”
Chief Anne Richardson of the Rappahannock Tribe in Virginia and Kathy Cummings-Dickinson, head of the Lumbee tribes in North Carolina, are supporters of the State of Israel as well. When the two female chiefs visited Israel in 2009, they declared, “We are here to deliver a message to the residents of Israel: Stand firm and united against the threats and pressure. We want to encourage Israel and the newly elected Knesset not to give in to those who try to pressure them to give up parts of the homeland. Surrender to this pressure is not a recipe for peace, but rather war. We stand beside you.” As Native Americans, they understand more than anyone else the consequences of attempting to give up land for peace.
Native American supporters of IsraelIndeed, the Jewish people, who have always sympathized with the oppressed, have a history of assisting the Native Americans in their just struggle for civil and human rights. In 1973, over 500 Native American activists were jailed after battling with American forces at Wounded Knee. Over 80 percent of the lawyers assisting these Native American activists were Jewish. Israel has also formed a close relationship with the Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana. Israel assists them with agriculture and trade, and the Coushatta have shown their appreciation by recognizing May 14th, Israel’s Independence Day, as a national Coushatta holiday. The Coushatta nation, like many other Native Americans, feel a special bond with the Jewish people due to the fact that both peoples have endured centuries of persecution, relocation and prejudice, while holding on to a strong commitment to their ancestral homeland.

amateur "hackers" of Anonymous are failing

Note that the amateur "hackers" of Anonymous are failing so they are deliberately using deceptive techniques to make you think some big sites are down when they are not down. They rely on most people being naive about how the Internet works so they are claiming tons of big Israeli government sites are down when they are not. They have only managed to hack into the usual low level un-secure websites that have little to no protection and that have no impact on Israel or our economy. They have failed so they are resorting to cheap tactics and psychological games, do not buy into it! Bringing down a site that sells Crystals online is not something to be proud of and is completely against their main goal which is to bring down the entire Internet in Israel. The fact that you can see this message means that they have failed hopelessly.

Saturday, April 6, 2013

Life Lessons I've Learned From Bugs Bunny



Life Lessons I've Learned
From
Bugs Bunny

By
                         Joanna Oznowicz-Davis

     Oh, stop laughing! Believe it or not, this is actually serious. Some of life's obvious (and yet profound) points come to us from sources we don't expect.

   Take...world history/current events, for example. One of the biggest issues brewing is the powder keg that is the Middle East. Oh sure, it's been that way for as long as I can remember. But then, I heard it as a kid and didn't pay a lot of attention. As an adult, I'm seeing what I didn't see or care about, when I was young.

  To look at the scenario in natural 'human' terms, Israel would seem to be in a no-win situation. The world sees the Arab nations (Muslim Brotherhood, PLO and the like) as heroes while Israel comes off, via the media, as the villain.

   Now, apart from the fact that the the city of JERUSALEM has been in JEWISH HANDS for at least 4000 years (since the days of King David) it is the height and depth of STUPIDITY to expect avowed enemies to live, as it were, under the same roof! And that's pretty much what this alleged two-state 'SOLUTION' boils down to.

   To illustrate the point, I'd like to share the particulars of a Bugs Bunny episode I saw recently. (So sue me, I'm a nostalgia freak!) Anywho, the story goes like this; Bugs Bunny's rabbit hole is covered over by a house built by Yosemite Sam. Of course, Sam, being a mainstay Warner Brothers scoundrel, insisted that Bugs was trespassing (sound familiar?) and so B.B takes the matter to court, where it's decided that the two share the 'disputed land' until one of them dies. At which time, the house and land would be inherited by the surviving resident. Brilliant idea...hmmm Not so much! See, from the day that decision was made, Yosemite Sam did EVERYTHING in his diabolical little imagination to get rid of Bugs Bunny, and to make sure HE was the surviving occupant of the house.  He'd try hitting Bugs with a mallet, used for 'straightening the carpet'. He poisoned his roomie's breakfast carrot juice, and crammed TNT down the rabbit hole (so he thought).  Doesn't that ring a few bells?

  In the eyes of the world court, (U.N) it seems to make sense to force Israel into
co-existence with a virulent enemy, who would just as soon poison  Israeli drinking water with drain cleaner before acknowledging Israel's right to exist! Compared to to what organizations (i.e. PLO) would do, if a TWO STATE NATION were forced on MID EAST tensions, Yosemite Sam would come off looking like Danny DeVito!

  Sadly, too.... TRAGICALLY, more like, is that the United Nations, (formerly the League of Nations, pre-World War 2) is making matters WORSE. They were supposed to be a body, dedicated to making sure that the atrocities of Nazi Germany did NOT occur again. Well, not only are they cheering on possible instigators; ('Imanutjob' of Iran ~Thank you, Jay Leno for that appropriate nickname!) but the UN appears to be aiding the REAL aggressors by forcing Israel to concede 'land for peace' until Israel is left with nowhere to call home when this modern-day Hitler decides to drive the Jews into the sea!

  As if it's not bad enough already, the U.S. President is singing the same tune; calling on ISRAEL to make the concessions and NOT those who would want the Jews driven from their own land. According to some sources, the AMERICAN map of the middle east does not show Israel (See Psalm 83 for clarity). Foolish! 

  In his book, "Eye to Eye", White House correspondent Bill Koenig has stipulated that those governments who get in the way of God's land and people end up suffering, one way or another. Disasters, man made or natural had a way of happening, as a result of, OR in order to curtail attempts to divide the land GOD gave to the descendants of Abraham, through Isaac. The most well known of which.... Spt 11th.2001.  Twenty four hours before that day, King Abdullah and Pres Bush (jr) were in round the clock talks to figure out a way to create the dreaded 'two state solution'. (MINUS any input from Israel, might I add! )G-D'S answer might have sounded like something from an old folk song, ¯"You mess with MY land. I'll mess with your land."¯  And lest we forget... Israel's enemies are also America's enemies. If Obama thinks he's gonna play footsie with Imanutjob and the Muslim Brotherhood in order to put them off ripping into America, BOY, has he got another thing coming! Assuming, for the sake of discussion, that Imanutjob gets his way on Israel, America will be left pretty near defenseless, since it's unlikely the Brits will want to antagonize Muslim nations. Especially with their fairly large Muslim population.  And Canada will be AT LEAST ambivalent about helping a country that turned its back on the ONLY middle-eastern DEMOCRACY!

  As with the situation with America and Catrina.... America put Israel in a place of DESTROYING JEWISH SETTLEMENTS. In that same period, Hurricane Catrina left thousands of Americans homeless!  What goes around, comes around. I might also add, to those celebs in the PRO-Obama camp (Barbra Streisand, and other well known dems...) it is time to GET OFF THE FENCE!!! You are either PRO-ISRAEL
OR pro-Obama. You CAN'T BE BOTH. If you think, for a second, that Imanutjob will care less how many concerts you've sold out or how many Oscars you've won, you're delusional! He and his lot consider America 'the great satan'. They HATE the Jewish people with a PASSION. If Israel is brought down (won't happen, but for the sake of discussion, let's say...)  what makes you think that Imanutjob and his cronies won't do worse to America,who, THEY see, as a spawning ground of moral degradation.

  On the other hand, let's play another scenario. Let's say Imanutjob tries with Israel and FAILS,  what makes Obama and his supporters so sure that they won't get hit, just for their standing with Israel's enemy?

 Back to the Bugs Bunny scenario....the ever-resourceful wabbit succeeded in outsmarting Yosemite Sam in his last attempt at killing him and destroying his home. Instead, Sam ended up sending his own house sky high and Bugs got his rabbit hole back. Fortunately, Israel has an ALLY a LOT more resourceful than even Bugs Bunny. And it's HIM Israel has to learn to trust. I mean, face it, gang, your neighbors might as well be the Manson's and with friends like Obama, who needs terrorists?